SLP Header

An Efficient Human Action Recognition System Using ANFIS

IJCSEC Front Page

Action recognition is needed in the ground of visual examination arrangement to recognize the signal articles. This paper presents the adaptive neural fuzzy inference system for recognizing the various human activities from the indication video series. Human body situation patterns are accepted by self organizing map. It’s been familiar with the constant human arrangements in the video series. Fuzzy inference system is suggested to detect the action organization. This technique maps, an established of response data into a set of desired. Bayesian framework to identify the various kinds of actions and appreciation results are formed for each camera. The suggested method is able to determine different occurrences of matching action completed by different people in different viewpoints truthfully than other standing methods in the modern literature.
Keywords:ANFIS, bayesian frameworks, human movement recognition, self organizing map, view invariance.
Human movement acknowledgment is the most commonly used approach for video exploration. It is considered as a main problem for several presentations in the visual investigation in looseness techniques, human and mechanism edge, analysis of video events, theatre and sports etc. The term programme describes the human action dealings in a small percentage of time. Action is classify from the activity. A disorder is a constant event of small atomic appointments. For example the activity pushing contains the engagements like walk, run and jump etc. Be familiar with the human action is a very routine problem because the actions may perform in a different custom depending upon the event such as comparable actions with countless garbs, action may be performed by changed kinds of people in multifactorial vantage point or dissimilar people completed the same action but it may appear in several ways . Protest of mortal achievement is used to equal the communiqué of all mortal body approaches by a self organizing map (SOM) in a neural complex. In the planning phase SOM is used to train the data in the posture images and embodies the actions also.
Adaptive neural unclear corollary system is mainly used for testing the data in the position images and harvests the accumulation results for human actions in the testing stage. It develops the prying. This method is very efficient to reduce the computational effect. Bayesian Background is used to identify the unknown actions and also produces combined gratitude results with high cataloguing accuracy. Unclear rules and the connection occupations parameters .For action arrangement Fuzzy reading system (FIS) is future. It robotically calculates the bound values without human direct Human action gratitude is a broadly studied area in computer vision. Its requests include investigation systems, video analysis, manufacturing and a variety of systems that involve exchanges between publics and automated devices such as human-computer borders. Its growth began in the early 1980s. To date, research has mainly attentive on knowledge and distinguishing actions from video categorizations taken by a single evident light camera. There is general nonfiction in action appreciation in a number of fields, counting computer vision, engine learning, decoration gratitude, signal dispensation, etc.. Between the changed types of landscapes for depiction, shapes and spatio-temporal curiosity points are most normally used. The methods planned in the past for shadow based action gratitude can be divided into two major groupings. One is to extract action descriptors from the arrangements of shadows. Predictable classifiers are normally used for gratitude . The other one is to extract features from each shadow and model the subtleties of the action obviously.


  1. Alexandros Iosifidis, Anastasios Tefas, and Ioannis Pitas,” View- invariant action recognition based on artificial neural networks,” IEEE Trans. Neural Netw., vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 412–424, Mar. 2012.
  2. B. Song, E. Tuncel, and A. Chowdhury, “Toward a multi-terminal video compression algorithm by integrating distributed source coding with geometrical constraints,” J. Multimedia, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 9–16, 2007.
  3. P. Barr, J. Noble, and R. Biddle, “Video game values: Human-computer interaction and games,” Interact. Comput, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 180–195, Mar. 2007.
  4. H. J. Seo and P. Milanfar, “Action recognition from one example,” IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 867– 882, May 2011.
  5. Mario I. Chacon-Murguia and Sergio Gonzalez-Duarte,” An adaptive neural-fuzzy approach for object detection in dynamic backgrounds for surveillance systems,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 59, no. 8, pp.3286–3298, Aug. 2012.
  6. O. Lanz, “Approximate Bayesian multibody tracking,” IEEE Trans.Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., vol. 28, no. 9, pp. 1436–1449, Sep. 2006.
  7. S. Ali and M. Shah, “Human action recognition in videos using kinematic features and multiple instance learning,” IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 288–303, Feb. 2010.
  8. M. Ahmad and S. Lee, “HMM-based human action recognition using multiview image sequences,” in Proc IEEE Int. Conf. Pattern Recognit.., vol. 1. Sep. 2006, pp. 263–266.
  9. N. Gkalelis, N. Nikolaidis, and I. Pitas, “View independent human movement recognition from multiview video exploiting a circular invariant posture representation,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Multimedia Expo, Jun. – Jul. 2009, pp. 394–397.
  10. F. Lv and R. Nevatia, “Single view human action recognition using key pose matching and viterbi path searching,” in Proc. IEEE Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit., Jun. 2007, pp.8
  11. Lena Gorelick and Moshe Blank and Eli Shechtman and Michal Irani and Ronen Basri,” Actions as Space - Time Shapes,” IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., vol. 29, no. 12, pp. 2247-2253, Dec. 2007.
  12. Y. Benezeth, P. Jodoin, B. Emile, H. Laurent, and C. Rosenberger, “Review and evaluation of commonlypp. implemented background subtraction algorithms,” in Proc. 19th Int. Conf. Pattern Recognit., Tampa, FL,Dec. 2009, pp. 1–4.
  13. M. Piccardi, “Background subtraction techniques: A review,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Syst., Man Cybern, vol. 4. Oct. 2004, pp. 3099– 3104.
  14. T. Kohonen, “The self-organizing map,” Proc. IEEE, vol. 78, no. 9, pp. 1464–1480, Sep. 2002.
  15. L. Maddalena and A. Petrosino, “A self-organization approach to background subtraction for visual surveillance applications,” IEEE Trans. Image Process., vol. 17, no. 7, pp. 1168–1177, Jul. 2008.